By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Pew PatriotsPew PatriotsPew Patriots
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Reading: Ayoob: Should You Always Get Off the X?
Share
Font ResizerAa
Pew PatriotsPew Patriots
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Guns and Gear

Ayoob: Should You Always Get Off the X?

Jimmie Dempsey
Last updated: September 24, 2026 3:59 pm
Jimmie Dempsey Published September 24, 2026
Share
SHARE

Editor’s Note: Be aware of your local and state as well as federal laws and how they apply to carrying firearms and self-defense. This article does not represent training advice/guidance. Please seek training from a professional firearms trainer for your self-defense needs.

You’re facing a deadly threat. You’re unsure of what your next move should be. Stress and tension are clouding your thoughts. What’s the “right” next move? Will you make the right choice, or the wrong one?

Learning the skill of getting off the “X” can potentially help you in many violent encounters. But is it the right move all the time?

For years now, instructors have taught defensive shooting students to begin their response to a deadly threat by “getting off the X” — that is, not standing still like a compliant target for their opponent. There are any number of situations where this makes perfect sense.

But there are some where it does not. Every now and then you find someone on the gun-related internet — or even an instructor — who tells you that when danger breaks out you must ALWAYS move.

“Always” can be a dangerous word …

Totality of Circumstances

The courts tell us that deadly force situations must always be examined with consideration to “the totality of the circumstances.” And common sense tells us the exact same thing.

getting off the x may not be a good idea if you are in a superior position behind cover
What if you have solid cover and a capable pistol in hand? In most cases you might be better off staying on that particular “X.” Image: Gail Pepin

Let’s look at some hypothetical situations. Suppose you have seen the danger coming. You have wisely moved to the best available cover (something that stops bullets) at a position which gives you the best possible commanding view of the danger scene. Your weapon is drawn and ready to be fired if necessary. You know exactly where the danger is and how it would have to approach to harm you. You are in control of access and egress. This position is your “X”, the spot you’ll be in if and when you have to start shooting.

Why on Earth would you leave that dominating position? Just because somebody told you to always “get off the X”?

When To Move

The proverbial Bad Guy is coming at you from in close with a knife, club, or his hands reaching for your pistol? It does indeed make good sense to move as you shoot. Moving straight back is not your best option: the (bad) guy can move forward a whole lot faster than the (good) guy can move backward.

consider if a vehicle is better for cover than getting off the x
A vehicle can influence the decision-making regarding movement if a violent attack is launched at you. Using it for cover may provide better protection than movement away from it.

You’re caught in the open and under fire from multiple opponents? A run to cover starts looking awfully good, so long as you move as fast as you can and get to cover before you return fire. I invoke master instructor John Farnam’s advice here: “If you’re going to run, run! If you’re going to shoot, shoot!”

The trouble with moving and shooting simultaneously is that it’s difficult as hell. Your body is the shooting platform, and it’s going to bounce each time one of your feet hits the ground.

Real-World Cases

Example 1: Eli Dicken. This young armed citizen was the certified hero who stopped a mass murder in an Indiana shopping mall. When the gunman started killing people with a rifle, Dicken drew his compact 9mm pistol and opened fire from an estimated 42 yards. The opponent didn’t go down. Dicken moved closer, and fired some more. It is unclear whether he fired while moving or shot with a move-stop-fire cadence. His movement was apparently to secure hits. He succeeded.

Master Instructor Jeff Hall here with his signature 1911 .45
Master Instructor Jeff Hall, here with his signature 1911 .45, teaches that “stand and deliver” defensive gunfire is sometimes the best plan. Image: Gail Pepin

Example 2: Jeff Hall. Some years ago I earned a black belt in Ho-Jutsu, the modernized art of martial arts combined with weaponcraft, which Soke Hall reconstituted for modern times with firearms. Hall himself is a multiple gunfight survivor. He teaches a class to police which he calls “Finish the Fight” which emphasizes a “stand your ground and shoot the opponent” philosophy. In his class, he discusses multiple cases of cops who tried to fire while running and failed to stop the threat, and multiple cases of officers who stood, aimed, and dropped their murderous opponents with center hits.

Example 3: the NYPD Stakeout Unit. I knew the two men on the squad who had killed the most armed criminals in face-to-face gunfights, Bill Allard and Jim Cirillo. Both knew how to shoot while moving … and both knew how difficult it was.

Jim Cirillo demonstrates shooting while moving
NYPD Stakeout Squad veteran Jim Cirillo demonstrates shooting while moving. Image: Andy Kemp

In one of Allard’s shootings, he was moving in on his two heavily armed opponents as he shot them — killing them both — and he did it to get a more effective angle of fire under those particular circumstances. Most of the time for both of those famous New York cops, their successful course of action was to take cover, carefully aim at the most vital parts of their opponents, and squeeze off the shots that put those bad people down and out.

Example 4: Jim Semone. This big-city Ohio cop prevailed in a dozen or more gunfights, one of them after he had been shot in the face with a .357 Magnum from ambush. Back in the 1980s when the late Ray Chapman and I were going around the country teaching Advanced Officer Survival Seminars for the Police Marksman Association, Jim was a guest lecturer for us in Ohio.

His advice for survival boiled down to “Suck it up for about a second, take a solid stance, aim your gun, and shoot your opponent dead center.” Suffice to say, it worked for him.

Example 5: “The Givens/Rangemaster Survivors.” Tom Givens is one of the all-time great gunfight survival instructors of our time. He has kept meticulous track of incidents in which his students have needed to use what he taught them. Tom teaches how to step off that X and draw and shoot, but he teaches it as only one component of the many skills one needs to survive a murder attempt.

Tom Givens founder and instructor of Rangemaster
Respected firearms instructor Tom Givens teaches students to move … sometimes. Image: Gail Pepin

He told me recently, “About 10% of our student incidents involved any real movement. I can only think of three in which the movement had an obvious important effect on the outcome. Two of those were at very close range, as in arm’s length in one case, and about 2.5 steps away in the other. In the third, the student moved away from innocents to draw fire away from them, while simultaneously moving to cover nearby.”

Tom added, “I think the emphasis on moving comes from force-on-force role play (FoF). There, everybody knows everybody has a gun, and the ‘bad guy’ is thinking, ‘When this guy moves, I will shoot him.’ I don’t care how well FoF is done, we cannot erase from the players’ minds that their opponent has a gun.”

Live The Armory Life. The latest content straight to your inbox plus an automatic entry to each of our monthly gun giveaways!

Givens concludes, “In actual incidents, the sudden appearance of a concealed handgun by the defender seems to knock the Bad Guy off the rails just long enough.”

Considering the Dynamics Involved

A basic truth of the shooting/moving thing is this: it is easier for a standing shooter to hit a moving target than for a moving shooter to hit a standing target, let alone for a moving shooter to hit a moving target.

A point to consider: the shotgun, with its spreading pattern of pellets, has always been the firearm of choice for moving targets. Consider the shotgun sports: skeet, trap, sporting clays. Find a trap or skeet shooter who is so good that he or she can reliably break 25 out of 25, or even 100 of 100, flying clay disks. Now put that many disks out on a backstop at the same distance and tell this ace shooter, “I want you to shoot on the run and hit those stationary targets from the same distance.”

Massad Ayoob shooting a Springfield Armory XD-M pistol from behind cover
If your “X” has you behind cover, why leave it? Here, Massad Ayoob fires a Springfield Armory XD-M from behind simulated cover at a shooting match. Image: Gail Pepin

They’ll probably tell you you’re nuts. And they’ll have a good point. (It may relieve the embarrassment if you tell them, “Some crazy guy in a gun article told me to ask you that.”)

As noted in the beginning of this article, “Get Off the X” is sometimes the best strategy.

But not always.

When getting off the X is the best strategy, now the choice is to shoot while moving or from a solid stance once you’re reached the place to which you chose to move (which hopefully also offers solid cover). In either case, you won’t want this to be the first time you’ve fired a gun while moving, or your first time shooting immediately after strenuously moving to your shooting position. There are super squad shooters out there who can shoot with accuracy on a dead run. Top instructor Gabe White comes to mind. Most of us, however, are not Gabe White.

There are few absolutes in training for the use of defensive firearms. “Get off the X,” I respectfully submit, is not one of those absolutes.

Editor’s Note: Please be sure to check out The Armory Life Forum, where you can comment about our daily articles, as well as just talk guns and gear. Click the “Go To Forum Thread” link below to jump in and discuss this article and much more!

Join the Discussion

Go to forum thread

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Civivi Iron Tide Rolling in Soon

Triumph and Tragedy: The USS Indianapolis

Review: EYV Hybrid Leather Holster for the Hellcat Pro

Cop-Killer Bullets: Gun Control Lie or Actual Threat?

North American F-107 Ultra Sabre: Too Advanced to Succeed?

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We Recommend

Angel mom says blue state DAs are putting illegal immigrant criminals before public safety

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey September 24, 2026
8 sailors attempted suicide aboard ships from Lincoln strike group, Cao says
WATCH: Mass walkout before Netanyahu speech prompts fiery response from Israeli prime minister
Inside the inaugural meeting of Trump’s Military Spouse Commission
If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Fulcrum: Quirky CRKT Folder Returns
Backlash erupts over Hasan Piker’s upcoming speaking engagement at Cornell
US destroyer practices at-sea drone refueling
Tactical

US destroyer practices at-sea drone refueling

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey September 24, 2026
News

‘Unmasking a Monster’: Golden State Killer series challenges timeline of Joseph DeAngelo’s crimes

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey September 24, 2026
Nominees voice commitment to veterans during hearing for veterans appeals roles
Tactical

Nominees voice commitment to veterans during hearing for veterans appeals roles

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey September 24, 2026
Pew Patriots
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Videos
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Guns and Gear
2024 © Pew Patriots. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?