By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Pew PatriotsPew PatriotsPew Patriots
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Reading: Trump administration wins Supreme Court fight to slash NIH medical research grants tied to DEI, LGBTQ studies
Share
Font ResizerAa
Pew PatriotsPew Patriots
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Trump administration wins Supreme Court fight to slash NIH medical research grants tied to DEI, LGBTQ studies
News

Trump administration wins Supreme Court fight to slash NIH medical research grants tied to DEI, LGBTQ studies

Jimmie Dempsey
Last updated: August 22, 2025 1:30 am
Jimmie Dempsey Published August 22, 2025
Share
SHARE

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Trump administration scored a major victory at the Supreme Court Thursday as the justices, in a 5-4 order, cleared his administration to slash more than $783 million in National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grants tied to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, LGBTQ issues and other hot-button areas.

The unsigned majority order said NIH “may proceed with terminating existing grants” while leaving in place a partial block on issuing new directives. 

The move delivers a political win for Trump’s broader push to roll back DEI programs across the federal government.

TRUMP-APPOINTED JUDGE STRIKES DOWN ANTI-DEI MEASURES FROM EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

The decision overturns rulings by lower courts that had blocked the cuts. In June, U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley of Massachusetts called the administration’s actions “arbitrary and capricious” and said NIH had “failed to provide a reasoned explanation” for cutting grants midstream. The First Circuit upheld her injunction in July, setting up Trump’s emergency appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Justice Department argued in its July 24 filing that leaving the injunction in place “forces NIH to continue funding projects inconsistent with agency priorities” and warned the order “intrudes on NIH’s core discretion to decide how best to allocate limited research funds.”

Opponents framed the cuts as ideological. The American Public Health Association warned that “halting these grants would devastate biomedical research across the country, disrupting clinical trials and delaying urgently needed discoveries” and said “the administration has offered no scientific basis for these cancellations — only ideology.” 

FEDERAL JUDGE SLAPS TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ON MISSISSIPPI DEI BAN

A building on the campus of the National Institutes of Health

A coalition of Democrat-led states led by Massachusetts argued that “patients should not be collateral damage in a political fight.”

News outlets stressed the stakes of Thursday’s decision. The Associated Press described the ruling as the Court letting Trump cut $783 million in research funding “in an anti-DEI push.” Reuters reported that “the Supreme Court in a 5–4 order cleared the way for the Trump administration to cut diversity-related NIH grants, though it left in place part of the ruling blocking new restrictions.”

DEI torn paper red

Research groups warned of the cuts’ fallout. The Association of American Universities said the cuts “risk chilling scientific inquiry by discouraging researchers from pursuing politically sensitive topics.” 

Scientists cautioned the decision could derail progress on diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer’s, even as the broader legal fight continues in the First Circuit and may return to the Supreme Court.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Colorado adds mobile bathroom near team bench for season opener after Deion Sanders’ bladder cancer treatment

Fever’s Sophie Cunningham appears to be hit by sex toy after lamenting possibility of it happening

EXCLUSIVE: Nancy Mace dismisses ‘burner’ account allegations as ‘bitter exes’ tale

Mamdani defends city-run grocery plan, says store owners can be ‘partners’

Shiloh Sharps 1874 Sporter # 1

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We Recommend
Trump’s SHOCKING Gun Ban Nobody Saw Coming
TacticalVideos

Trump’s SHOCKING Gun Ban Nobody Saw Coming

Line45 Line45 September 13, 2025
Charlie Sheen admits he’s been celibate for nearly a decade since getting sober
NFL to let teams decide on Charlie Kirk tributes after mandating moment of silence in recent game
New Pistol Suppressors for 2025
🔴 Ukraine War – Ukrainian Elite Storm Soldiers In Brutal Trench Combat With Russian Forces
Fox News AI Newsletter: Backlash over mystery company’s data center
Rural Defense – Part II
Tactical

Rural Defense – Part II

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey September 13, 2025
Did Someone Close To Charlie Kirk Give A Signal To The Assassin That It Was Time To Take The Shot?
Prepping & Survival

Did Someone Close To Charlie Kirk Give A Signal To The Assassin That It Was Time To Take The Shot?

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey September 13, 2025
New photo reveals slain Queens couple attacked in brutal home invasion; suspect charged with murder
News

New photo reveals slain Queens couple attacked in brutal home invasion; suspect charged with murder

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey September 13, 2025
Pew Patriots
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
  • Guns and Gear
2024 © Pew Patriots. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?