By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Pew PatriotsPew PatriotsPew Patriots
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Reading: Hegseth doesn’t initially commit to obeying courts on LA deployments
Share
Font ResizerAa
Pew PatriotsPew Patriots
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Hegseth doesn’t initially commit to obeying courts on LA deployments
Tactical

Hegseth doesn’t initially commit to obeying courts on LA deployments

Jimmie Dempsey
Last updated: June 12, 2025 8:24 pm
Jimmie Dempsey Published June 12, 2025
Share
SHARE

Editor’s note: This report has been updated to include remarks Hegseth made later in Thursday’s hearing after the report’s initial publication.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth initially sidestepped questions from a lawmaker on whether he would obey a court were it to rule that the Trump administration’s recent deployment of active-duty troops to Los Angeles was illegal.

“What I can say is we should not have local judges determining foreign policy and national security policy in the country,” Hegseth said, testifying Thursday before the House Armed Services Committee.

The secretary responded to questions from Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who pressed on the controversial use of military forces in the city in response to protests against the administration’s immigration crackdown.

“You’re not willing to say you would respect those decisions,” Khanna asked, referencing potential rulings by a district court and the Supreme Court.

“What I’m saying is: Local district judges shouldn’t make foreign policy for the United States,” Hegseth said.

RELATED

Later, when pressed again on the issue by Rep. Sarah Elfreth, D-Md., Hegseth stepped back from his earlier position.

“We’re not here to defy a Supreme Court ruling,” he said.

In reference to other immigration cases, the administration has argued that courts are overstepping their authority by challenging the government’s foreign policy role. Still, any deployments on U.S. soil are domestic policy and governed by law prohibiting troops from conducting law enforcement — that is unless the president invokes the Insurrection Act.

The Pentagon has approved 4,000 federalized National Guard troops and 700 Marines to protect immigration agents and federal property in Los Angeles, responding to a weekend of protests around the administration’s deportation policies.

Hegseth has approved the deployments without the approval of local officials — something that hasn’t occurred in 60 years. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has sued to remove the troops, with the case now before a district court.

In previous testimony this week, Hegseth said the deployments will last 60 days, and a Pentagon official speaking alongside him estimated they would cost $134 million.

Hegseth also said Wednesday that the military was prepared to deploy troops in other cities in response to other protests, which have spread since the weekend.

“Part of it is getting ahead of a problem, so that if in other places — if there are other riots in places where law enforcement officers are threatened — we would have the capability to surge National Guard there if necessary,” Hegseth said.

The administration’s executive order approving the deployments said that the president could send troops to cities where protests were ongoing or “likely to occur,” envisioning a far broader domestic use of American forces than in past administrations.

Noah Robertson is the Pentagon reporter at Defense News. He previously covered national security for the Christian Science Monitor. He holds a bachelor’s degree in English and government from the College of William & Mary in his hometown of Williamsburg, Virginia.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Government funding bill clears Congress, averting a shutdown

First Look: Hornady Dehumidifier Rod HD

First Look: G9 Defense 126 Grain Subsonic 9mm Ammunition

These 5 1911 Handguns Are The Best For 2025!

First Look: Springfield Armory Model 2020 Heatseeker Rifle

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We Recommend
Boston University releases statement following Alex Cooper’s claims of sexual harassment by former coach
News

Boston University releases statement following Alex Cooper’s claims of sexual harassment by former coach

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey June 13, 2025
Young voters give Trump mixed grades in NY Times survey, but majority say US will be ‘better’ in four years
US shifts warships in Mideast in response to Israel strikes
Israel Attacks Iran: Trump Vows To Defend Israel
Why Did Dirty Harry Carry a 43 Magnum?
Equestrian Australia suspends Olympian Heath Ryan after concerning video surfaces showing him whipping horse
First Look: Cole Fine Guns Firearms Maintenance Products
Tactical

First Look: Cole Fine Guns Firearms Maintenance Products

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey June 13, 2025
Fort Benning upgrades range to accommodate new sniper rifle
Tactical

Fort Benning upgrades range to accommodate new sniper rifle

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey June 13, 2025
NYPD ramps up security at Jewish sites across NYC after Israeli strikes on Iran
News

NYPD ramps up security at Jewish sites across NYC after Israeli strikes on Iran

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey June 13, 2025
Pew Patriots
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
  • Guns and Gear
2024 © Pew Patriots. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?