By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Pew PatriotsPew PatriotsPew Patriots
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Reading: Air Force eyes longer range for F-47 as combat edge in Pacific theater
Share
Font ResizerAa
Pew PatriotsPew Patriots
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Guns and Gear
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Air Force eyes longer range for F-47 as combat edge in Pacific theater
Tactical

Air Force eyes longer range for F-47 as combat edge in Pacific theater

Jimmie Dempsey
Last updated: May 15, 2025 1:44 am
Jimmie Dempsey Published May 15, 2025
Share
SHARE

The Air Force plans for its sixth-generation F-47 fighter to be able to fly significantly farther than previous jets.

In a graphic posted Tuesday on X, formerly known as Twitter, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Dave Allvin said the F-47 would have a combat radius of more than 1,000 nautical miles, advanced stealth capabilities, and be able to fly at speeds greater than Mach 2, or more than 1,500 miles per hour.

Allvin’s post also said the first generation of semi-autonomous drones known as collaborative combat aircraft would have a combat radius of more than 700 nautical miles and stealth comparable to that of the F-35. Combat radius refers to how far an aircraft can fly away from its base or last refueling point, reach its target and carry out its mission, and safely fly back, and roughly equates to half of a plane’s total range.

If those predictions pan out, the F-47 would have a greatly expanded range than the F-22 Raptor, whose combat radius is 590 nautical miles, and the F-35A, with a combat radius of 670 nautical miles. It would also be much faster than the F-35A, whose top speed is Mach 1.6, or about 1,200 miles per hour.

That higher range would be a major benefit during a potential conflict with China. A war in the Pacific would require the Air Force’s aircraft to cross stretches of ocean to reach their targets, in contested airspace where aerial refueling may not be possible. Air Force leaders and aviation experts have expressed concern about whether the service’s existing aircraft would have enough range to get to Chinese targets on their own.

The Air Force also shifted course while the first CCAs were being designed to increase their range. In a July 2024 interview with Defense News, former Air Force acquisition chief Andrew Hunter said the service brought operators from Air Combat Command in to consult with acquisition experts on what CCAs would need to do operationally.

Those operators flagged a range shortcoming in the early plans for CCAs, which would have kept them from flying far enough to be effective in combat, Hunter said. This would particularly have presented a problem in the Pacific.

Hunter declined at that time to describe the CCAs’ range, but said the Air Force pushed contractors to find a “sweet spot” of enough range, at a reasonable price and on schedule.

The companies making the first two CCAs are General Atomics and Anduril Industries, which will build the YFQ-42A and YFQ-44A, respectively. Allvin’s post said their top speed is classified.

Allvin’s post also said the service hopes to have the F-47 and CCAs operational by the end of the decade. He said the Air Force will buy at least 185 F-47s — at least as many as the F-22, which the F-47 is meant to replace — and more than 1,000 CCAs.

Former Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall last year put the NGAD program on hold due to concerns about costs. Each NGAD fighter was originally likely to cost about three times as much as an F-35, or as much as $300 million per tail.

That cost would have limited how many NGAD fighters the Air Force could have bought, Kendall said last summer, and prompted the service to rethink the program and look for ways to bring costs down.

Stephen Losey is the air warfare reporter for Defense News. He previously covered leadership and personnel issues at Air Force Times, and the Pentagon, special operations and air warfare at Military.com. He has traveled to the Middle East to cover U.S. Air Force operations.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Review: Taurus TX-22 Compact TORO

Russia, US agree to work towards improving ties and ending Ukraine war

.22 LR Rifles.. What NO ONE is Telling You!

Convicted veterans among Jan. 6 rioters granted pardons, commutations

First Shots: EAA Girsan Witness 2311 Brat

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We Recommend
Republicans struggle with Trump’s mixed signals on ‘big, beautiful bill’
News

Republicans struggle with Trump’s mixed signals on ‘big, beautiful bill’

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey May 15, 2025
Karen Read trial: Crime lab expert testifies blood evidence was never tested
El Chapo’s family members cross US border in apparent deal with Trump administration
Wings’ Paige Bueckers reacts to Mavericks landing top pick in NBA Draft: ‘God makes no mistakes’
Hamas captivity survivors appeal to Netanyahu, Trump after Edan Alexander’s release
Air Force eyes longer range for F-47 as combat edge in Pacific theater
Cooper Flagg reveals why people told him he’d ‘never make it’ as an elite basketball player
News

Cooper Flagg reveals why people told him he’d ‘never make it’ as an elite basketball player

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey May 15, 2025
Army task forces ‘centerpiece’ for deterring China: INDOPACOM boss
Tactical

Army task forces ‘centerpiece’ for deterring China: INDOPACOM boss

Jimmie Dempsey Jimmie Dempsey May 15, 2025
TOP 15 Best Concealed Carry Guns 2025: New #1 Carry Gun!
TacticalVideos

TOP 15 Best Concealed Carry Guns 2025: New #1 Carry Gun!

Line45 Line45 May 14, 2025
Pew Patriots
  • News
  • Tactical
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Guns and Gear
  • Videos
2024 © Pew Patriots. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?